Features 01
Expected Problems
Don't you have the following problems in press-forming fracture evaluations using conventional FLD?
?Not suitable for UHSS, which have a high risk of fracture.
?Can't shorten the die tuning period because of the large number of trial dies required due to poor fracture prediction accuracy.
?Impossible to design parts that make full use of the ductility potential of the material applied.
Features 02
Technology highlight
?Poor fracture prediction accuracy by conventional 2D-FLD based on the minimum principal strain and maximum principal strain as indexes (Fig. 1, 2).
?Focused on the effects of the contact surface pressure between the tool and blank and the strain path with FLD tests on prediction accuracy.
?Improved fracture prediction accuracy by use of a 3D-FLD based on the contact surface pressure, strain ratio and equivalent plastic strain (Fig. 3).
Features 03
Proposed Solutions (Examples)
Fracture prediction of structural members applying UHSS.